Chris Pretty sad that Logitech has turned to using in-house trolls to defend their lack of product development. I also agree that they need to update their Trackman(x) series of thumb-balls to in line with their other pointing devices. Actually, it’s not possible for a reasonable person to think otherwise so, “Jeff’s Mom” get back to work. Ah-ha, maybe that’s it, “Jeff’s Mom” is the engineer responsible for updating the Trackman series and he’s trying to cover up for years of trolling the Internet instead. Harley First off, I have to say I absolutely LOVE the concept of unifying devices on one receiver especially one this size. As someone with a veritable fleet of Logitech devices of varying ages, I have receivers of all shapes and sizes sticking out of my various systems.
And some of those are so large they block the port next to them. So it would be amazing to combine them on one receiver. But that seems to also be the issue: no backwards compatibility. Since I already have a huge number of devices, it seems very wasteful to replace them all just to combine them on one receiver. I’d be a whole lot more willing to buy a separate unifying receiver capable of combining my existing devices than replacing my current devices. Especially when some of those devices haven’t seen or wont’ see worthy replacements (my G7 gaming mouse, for instance) that are compatible. Sadly, this seems like another offering born of a great idea, but lacking the features to make it a truly great product.
Ray Excellent concept, I’ve been waiting for more Logitech products to adopt the same “nub” adapter as the nano VX mouse and not just those aimed at notebooks. I really want to use this for my desktop to eliminate clumsy receivers and the clutter of more wires behind my computer.
I do have a few questions: 1. When will the keyboards be released? The announcement is rather vague about availability. Will there be a more ergonomic keyboard (such as an updated comfort laser) added as a future supported product in the future? And as an extension of the previous question, will this be a long term direction of adding more and more new products to this connectivity platform? Eric broser power/rep range/shock workout pdf. Allen I too am dissappointed that this unifying receiver is not backward compatable. I have purchased numerous Logitech Mice and Keyboards, and combo units for myself and my children.
Unfortunately i had to purchase an expensive KVM switch if i wanted to connect multiple systems, and use only one keyboard and mouse. I have an MX1000 mouse and MX3000 keyboard.
Spider crack codes. They share a common receiver, however the KVMs do not support the full function of these mice/keyboard functions. I have the latest setpoint software but the KVM does not see the mouse.
Treats the mouse as a generic device, so no functionality. I saw the unifying receiver through one of the many adds which Logitech sends to my email, and with excitement thought this may the answer to my problembut alas i still have to use multiple keyboards and different mice to allow me to use multiple systems on one desk (gets kind of crowded). Sorry Logitech, but you get a thumbs down on this one from me.
Hello, Some Unifying-ready Logitech devices, such as the M305 mouse, come with a non-Unifying receiver. It looks the same, but instead of the Unifying logo it has 'NANO RECEIVER' written on the case. The device ID of the nano receiver is 0xc52f. I have M305 and M175 mice. Both of them come with one of these Nano receivers. I added the ID to the code and your pairing tool worked, both mice pair successfully. All it needs is a new define in line 29: define USBDEVICEIDM305NANORECEIVER (s16)0xc52f and including this new ID in the comparison in line 59: info.product!= USBDEVICEIDM305NANORECEIVER && I'm posting this here in case you want to add it to the code.
It does support battery information, although the granularity depends on the device. For example, an Anywhere MX can report battery with a precision of 1%, but a M525 mouse can only report 'critical' (5%), 'low' (20%), 'high' (50%) or 'full' (90%). For just battery information, you can also rely on UPower 0.9.22 or later (earlier versions were buggy). Example: $ upower -d.
Logitech Vx Nano Receiver
Device: /org/freedesktop/UPower/devices/keyboard0003o046DoC52Bx001B native-path: /sys/devices/pci00:00:1a.0/usb1/1-1/1-1.1/1-1.1:1.2/0003:046D:C52B.0016/0003:046D:C52B.001B vendor: Logitech, Inc. Model: K800 serial: FB841B86 power supply: no updated: Tue 05 Nov 2013 07:15:32 PM CET (11 seconds ago) has history: yes has statistics: no keyboard present: yes rechargeable: yes state: discharging percentage: 55%. (if you know the path, you can also use upower -i /org/freedesktop/UPower/devices/keyboard0003o046DoC52Bx001B to restrict the output to a single device). I've changed the perms for all my /dev/hidraw.
devices as bellow: $ ls -l /dev/hidraw. crw-rw-.
1 root gpborges 249, 0 May 26 11:56 /dev/hidraw0 crw-rw-. 1 root gpborges 249, 1 May 26 11:56 /dev/hidraw1 crw-rw-.
1 root gpborges 249, 2 May 26 11:56 /dev/hidraw2 crw-rw-. 1 root gpborges 249, 3 May 26 12:37 /dev/hidraw3 crw-rw-.
1 root gpborges 249, 4 May 26 12:37 /dev/hidraw4 crw-rw-. An algorithm for differential file comparison bibtex. 1 root gpborges 249, 5 May 26 11:56 /dev/hidraw5 crw-rw-. 1 root gpborges 249, 6 May 26 11:56 /dev/hidraw6 crw-rw-.
1 root gpborges 249, 7 May 26 12:01 /dev/hidraw7 gpborges@gpborges:$ And after that, I'm seeing this error when I run ltunify.